And here is the comment I wrote in response:
I agree that these MFA programs shouldn't let James Frey in for his song and dance. Nor should those students let themselves in for it. But in defense of MFA programs, I will say that I made connections in mine that have been invaluable to me professionally. And yes, I have published, and I've got a sustainable career as a writer. I may be in the minority, but I think that's because I didn't give up when the going got tough, and I've had a few lucky turns, for which I am very grateful. If not for my MFA program, I doubt I would have been in a position to be "lucky," and I might not have had the wisdom to avail myself of opportunities. MFA's aren't the only way to go, not by a long shot, but they're not all bad, either. (And incidentally, word to the wise, if you're planning on going for an MFA, get a job at the university you're attending if they offer a tuition benefit. Most do. My MFA was basically free. I had to work my butt off, but that's good prep for being a professional writer anyway.)
What do you think? Is Hillary Rettig being too hard on MFA programs, or am I being too easy on them?
--
www.amykathleenryan.com
--
www.amykathleenryan.com
Splendid post.
ReplyDeleteGreat post --I agree with you fully. Completing an MFA was extremely useful for me.
ReplyDeleteI can't speak to the benefits of MFA, because I don't have one, but graduate degrees of any kind are often as useful as the faculty you have and effort you put into them. I AM glad that they aren't required, as I already have too many degrees to add another to the list! :)
ReplyDeleteNo, they are not a scam. My thesis was published by Delacorte, but as importantly, I had access to excellent lit teachers, such as Dale Peck and Steven Wright, who I not only learned a great deal from, but who are mentors.
ReplyDeleteThe peer writing community was also invaluable--the contacts and friends you make in the program.